
There seems to be some falling out over John Chow’s decision to charge his readers to remove the “no-follow” links from their comments. Paying $10 a month will allow you to get some “link love” from this PR6 blog. If a blog could be a sleazy infomercial on TV with some guy preaching about get-rich-quick schemes, John Chow would be the head spokesperson.
My anger is mainly over John’s decision to charge his readers money to remove the do-follow links. This topic has been beat to death, but I wanted to voice my opinion on the issue since this is after all the place where it’s all about the readers.
The John Chow Do-Follow Argument
John Chow could sneeze and get two hundred comments. He gets a bunch and that’s fine. John has a top-commentators section on the right sidebar. If you make it to that “coveted” top commentator spot, you get a link back to your site with the “no-follow” tag removed. JohnChow.com has a PR6, so having the no-follow tag will allow his PR6 to pass on in theory.
John’s argument is, instead of wasting time and energy getting to that top commentator spot, why not pay ten dollars a month and get your “no-follow” tag removed that way? In John’s own words, he said this:
But I am giving something. This blog is PR6 and that link love passes on when there is no nofollow.
There are enough people commenting like mad to get on the Top Commentators list because the links there don’t have nofollow. If you look at the effort it takes to get on the list, paying $10 really isn’t so bad.
So he’s doing you a favor by removing the nofollow, right?
Another commenter posted this additional argument:
I guess your site would be full of meaningless comments if all comment links were free.
So the argument has turned into paying readers for the privilege of commenting and having the “no-follow” link removed? Read more…